As a teacher, I always knew that my lessons and instruction were better when my class sizes were smaller. Unfortunately, there has not been much research to support that "hunch" in the past. However, a recent interview with Dr. Jeremy Finn on NPR may change that. Check out the quote below:
BRAND: How is student behavior different in small class sizes?
Dr. FINN: It's because every student is on what I would call the firing line. You can't hide in the back corner of the room. Students are better behaved. They pay more attention. They support each other in learning more, and their - definitely, their achievement scores go up. Furthermore, it's been shown that for children who were in small classes for three or four years, graduation from high school is more likely. Taking college entrance exams is more likely. So these early grades of small classes have long-lasting effects.
BRAND: And by early grades, you're talking kindergarten through third grade.
Dr. FINN: That's correct.
BRAND: I read an article recently in the New Yorker written by Malcolm Gladwell, and it talked a lot about teachers and class size, and I just want to read you a quote from him. He is skeptical that class size is as important as it's made out to be. He writes: You have to cut the average class almost in half to get the same boost that you'd get if you switched from an average teacher to a teacher in the 85th percentile. So in essence, he's saying that teacher competency is better and more important to student achievement than class size.
Dr. FINN: I've heard that argument many times before. There really aren't data that make that comparison directly. But I would argue, and as I have many times, that what you want is both a good teacher and a small class. Imagine what a good teacher could do with a small class.
The entire article/interview is available
here.
Feel free to share it with your fellow teachers and rejoice!